We have been taught for decades that Charles Darwin proved how man evolved from apes, in a linear evolution from amphibians at sea. This is not true.
Evolution from one species to another has never been proven, only slight variations within species is documented.
The idea preached in almost every classroom in the West has been that sea creatures crawled up on the land and slowly evolved into other species, and that homo sapiens became the brilliant evolutionary end product of this process.
Even though Darwinism has massive flaws and remains a theory, Darwin is still widely used as an example of how “modern empiricism and science” demonstrates how incompetent and “un-scientific” its critics are.
For example, if you question the famous drawing still depicted in thousands of school books where you see the monkey turning into Neanderthals and then homo sapiens, there is no end to the criticism from Darwinists. We are regularly told by those who govern popular culture that criticism of the “biological ladder” theory means you are lack knowledge.
This happens even though science long ago proved it wrong. It was discovered many years ago that Neanderthals lived on earth at the same time as homo sapiens, writes bestselling author and founder of The Herland Report, Hanne Nabintu Herland in her regular column at World Net Daily, the largest conservative media outlet in America.
WND is America’s largest Conservative network with columnists such as Larry Elder, Ann Coulter, John Whitehead, Joseph Farah, Ben Shapiro, Dinesh d’Souza, Pat Buchanan, Dennis Prager, David Kupelian, Jesse Lee Peterson and most of the leading Conservatives in the United States.
So, why are atheists so certain that homo sapiens evolved from amphibia? The assertion is based on pure faith and feelings and lacks every proof of science. A Darwinist is someone who believes in the irrationalities of Darwinism and its unproven theory, desperately hoping for it one day to be provable through empirical studies.
What becomes apparent is that atheism itself is a faith. It is based on faith in the unseen. No atheist has, to my knowledge, travelled out into the universe and can document scientifically that there are no angels or demons there, or God.
Darwinism remains a theory: What the English naturalist, Charles Darwin, outlined in The Origin of Species (1859) remains a theory.
It is unproven hypothesis regarding the development of the species from the lower and simple to the higher and more complex, through the process of natural selection and the survival of the fittest. It still relies on a long number of assumptions.
RELATED ARTICLES:
- Iben Thranholm TV interview: The world is not only political, it is a spiritual place
- The belief in Modern Science as if it is a Religion
- Science is the Atheist new Religion: Empiricism as Religious Belief
- Atheism is the new Religion. The very failed version
- Universities as propaganda tools, not learning institutions
Darwinism remains a theory, was never proven: In essence, Darwin’s evolution has to be accepted by faith – they believe in it, regardless of whether it has been empirically proven or not. Verifiable proof still is missing.
Despite its obvious flaws, the theory still remains at the forefront of atheist thought.
Scientists have been unable to prove development from one species to another.
The only element that is documented is that all species derive from one common ancestor, as pointed out by biology professor at Lehigh University, Michael J. Behe in Darwin’s Black Box. The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution.
The forming of new species – “macroevolution” has never been observed, only variations within each species – “microevolution,” such as birds getting longer or shorter wings.
Evolution beyond variation remains an assumption. Darwin could not even explain the complexity of a human cell.
As Behe states, the universe as a whole is extremely fine-tuned for life, suggesting nature exhibits evidence of intelligent design.
Another intelligent-design theorist, Michael A. Cremo points out in Rethinking Darwin: A Vedic Study of Darwinism and Intelligent Design and Forbidden Archaeology, that not only did the Neanderthals live on earth in the same time period as Homo sapiens, as modern science now acknowledges, but human remains have been found in the Earth’s layers millions of years ago.
So, it is documented that previous human-like creatures cannot be called “human ancestors,” as they lived on the earth, side by side with homo sapiens.
Still and until this day, biology school books still show the illustration starting with an amphibia evolving into a monkey, then developing towards Neanderthals and finally – the upright Homo sapiens.
Children’s biology books continue to propagate for the outdated view on the development of Homo sapiens, yet another illustration of how candid academic atheists are to repeat the current paradigm, even if it has been proven wrong.
Cremo suggests that the current paradigm and “academic” belief in Darwinism suppresses data if it does not coincide with evolutionary theory.
New revelations and findings are simply silenced, in order not to challenge the current understanding of evolution.
Modern science constantly changes its hypothesis, depending on the popular “academic belief.” In the 1920s, most scientists believed that the world was static. Whoever contradicted the prevailing view, would be called “unscientific.”
Then the American astronomer, Edwin Hubble studied the universe and found evidence of its expansion.
The debate was settled, and a new paradigm introduced: The universe as we know it expands. Whoever now said that it was static, was suddenly the one deemed to be irrational.
Even Albert Einstein spent almost fifteen years denying that the universe was expanding, trying to rework the equations to prove that the universe is static.
In his final memoirs, The World as I see it, he calls this the biggest mistake of his career, and complains that it caused him not to make any major discoveries during those fifteen years, as he remained in his old-fashioned thinking even if science kept proving him wrong.
