The government in the UK is significantly influenced, if not controlled, by a “deep state” or permanent bureaucracy. Key institutions such as the Bank of England, the Treasury, and the civil service wield substantial power behind the scenes, often beyond the reach of elected officials.
Ministers and the Prime Minister are often constrained by this entrenched system, which manages budgets, policy implementation, and legal oversight independently of electoral mandates.
The Bank of England governor holds considerable unaccountable power through an eight-year term and can only be removed for gross negligence. This autonomy allows the governor to shape monetary policy—like setting interest rates and controlling money supply—without direct democratic oversight. The Bank’s decisions profoundly affect the economy and citizens’ lives but remain largely insulated from political accountability.
The British Deep State Explained: This is former UK Prime Minister, Liz Truss’ explanation to The Daily Expresso Podcast as to what is happening in the UK and why its politicians quench free speech and vital democratic rights as the British population are subjected to an authoritarian discrimination that we have not seen the like of in generations.
The tension between unelected experts (technocrats) and democratic governance is a central theme. The speaker criticizes reliance on unelected technocrats to run key economic and fiscal functions, arguing that this undermines democracy.
Although some trust technocrats due to their expertise, this trust effectively supports a form of technocracy rather than democratic rule, as these officials are not elected and have their own agendas. The influence of unelected technocrats with entrenched ideological views limits the democratic mandate of elected governments. If unelected officials dictate policy irrespective of voter preferences, democratic accountability is compromised.
The British Deep State Explained: The unelected officials, including senior Treasury staff and Bank of England leadership, have a distinct worldview. They generally support policies like net zero carbon emissions, mass migration, the globalist economic model, Keynesian economics, and high taxation/spending. This ideological stance influences their decisions and is not neutral, contrary to the common perception of technocrats as impartial experts.
Yet, institutions like the Bank of England have failed repeatedly without facing consequences, highlighting a lack of accountability that undermines public trust and good governance. The governor is appointed for eight years and can only be removed for gross negligence, which effectively grants a high degree of independence from government control.
The Bank of England and Treasury have strong media influence, making critical stories about them rare. This control over the narrative shapes public perception and policy debates. The mainstream media’s reluctance to challenge entrenched institutions suppresses important public debate. Independent media outlets are crucial for exposing hidden power structures and informing citizens, Liz Truss explains.
RELATED ARTICLES:
- The Downfall of Europe: Former UK PM Liz Truss wants national sovereignty, accountability, restoration of traditional values
- Liz Truss: A particular group of non-elected people have taken over British institutions and push mass migration and multiculturalism
- Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss on the downfall of Europe
- Racism Against Indigenous Europeans by their own Governments: The UK Horror Story
- UK Authoritarian Control: This age will be viewed as the darkest stain on British history, says the Christian activist, Tommy Robinson
- Rise of European Authoritarianism: Alarming election interference, suppression of free speech
The British Deep State Explained: The permanent civil service and institutions like the Bank of England effectively control major aspects of government policy and budgetary decisions. Ministers and elected officials often have limited influence over these areas once policies are set in motion. For example, the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR)
sets fiscal parameters that constrain the Chancellor’s budget decisions, effectively limiting elected officials’ freedom to implement their policies.
The Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey has publicly criticized Brexit and promoted net zero policies. Mark Carney, a former Bank governor, is linked to climate change agendas and economic policy failures in Canada. The Bank of England’s announcement of selling £4 billion in gilts before the mini-budget, combined with poor regulation of pension funds betting on low-interest rates, triggered market instability in 2022.
Despite public elections favoring governments promising lower taxes and reduced immigration, policies enacted often run counter to these preferences. This disconnect is attributed to the influence of the unelected bureaucracy, which imposes its worldview regardless of electoral outcomes, frustrating voters who feel their voices are ignored.
Attempts to implement reform, such as those proposed by the speaker during their time in government, faced significant opposition not only from the Bank of England and Treasury but also from factions within their own political party. These “bad actors” benefit from the status quo and actively resist change. This entrenched resistance makes meaningful reform difficult.
Liz Truss advocates for fundamental economic reforms to reverse what they describe as a “death spiral” of rising taxes, stagnating growth, and increasing public spending. Their vision includes promoting fracking, easing building regulations, lowering taxes to stimulate business growth, cutting wasteful spending, and reforming immigration policies. The goal is to boost economic activity and thereby increase tax revenues organically, enabling better public services.
Examples of institutional failure cited include the Bank of England’s mishandling of financial stability during the 2022 crisis, inadequate supervision of the pension industry, and ineffective inflation management. Similar failures are noted in other bodies like the Home Office and the Climate Change Committee, yet none of these officials face accountability or consequences.
The British Deep State Explained: Powerful institutions like the Bank of England exert significant influence over mainstream media, which often avoids critical coverage. This media environment limits public awareness and debate about the real power dynamics and policy failures. Independent media platforms, such as the Joe Rogan Experience or new ventures like the Daily Espresso, are seen as vital for breaking through this information blockade.
Liz Truss also touches on the difference between the UK and American systems, particularly regarding appointments. In the US, political appointments of experts or business leaders (e.g., Elon Musk, Scott Bessant) are common, and these individuals would be considered politicians in the UK context. Truss suggests that political appointments by elected leaders, as opposed to entrenched unelected bureaucrats, are preferable if those appointees are competent. The US system’s use of business leaders and experts as political appointees contrasts with the UK’s reliance on career bureaucrats, underscoring different approaches to balancing expertise and democratic legitimacy.
Attempts to change economic and immigration policies have been thwarted by a combination of bureaucratic power and political factions invested in maintaining the status quo. This resistance is systemic and difficult to overcome. Reviving the UK economy necessitates lowering taxes, encouraging business investment, reducing regulatory burdens, and cutting wasteful spending. Only through growth can tax revenues rise sustainably and fund public services effectively.
Political appointments of competent leaders could offer a better balance. Rather than leaving key economic roles to unelected bureaucrats, democratically accountable leaders should have the power to appoint competent experts, ensuring a balance between expertise and democratic control.
The level of censorship in social media and search engines is all-time high. Do like thousands of others, subscribe to The Herland Report newsletter here!
Led by Scandinavian bestselling author, Hanne Nabintu Herland, The Herland Report provides independent analysis from leading Western intellectuals and ground breaking Podcasts and YouTube interviews, cutting through the mainstream media rhetoric. It is a great place to watch interviews and read the articles of leading intellectuals, thought leaders, authors and activists from across the political spectrum. The Herland Report believes in freedom of speech and its editorial policy resides above the traditional Left vs Right paradigm which we believe has lost its relevance and ability to describe the current driving forces in Western politics.
