Sadly it has come to this, that skin color again is front and central, a natural consequence of the implementation of Marxist socialism in the West.
Traditional, historic Western values represent the very opposite ethic system. It was traditional values that created the greatness of America, that national unity regardless of race, creed, gender or ethnic origin unified the American people into one great nation. This is now gone, leaving Americans divided like never before.
How Marxism successfully broke the West: The Left has implemented the Neo-Marxist philosopher, Jacques Derrida’s (1930-2004) racist multiculturalism that does not permit equal treatment regardless of race and ethnic origin, writes historian of comparative religions, bestselling author and founder of The Herland Report, Hanne Nabintu Herland.
The French philosopher Derrida is called the father of multiculturalism. He came from the African continent, born and raised in Algeria. The Algerian French philosopher was the mastermind behind the racist and misogynist theory of deconstruction. His revolt against the traditional family and Western society is notorious.
His deconstruction multiculturalism theory arguably automatically prescribes the role of the victim to anyone with darker skin color, women or some other sub-group in society. The tyranny of the minorities is in effect the result. This narrative, how widely unjust and racist it sounds, asserts that certain ethnic groups – among them blacks – are not to be held accountable in the same way one would do with a white person.
Note: Also watch Hanne Nabintu Herland’s recent interview with WND co-founder, Elizabeth Farah.
How Marxism successfully broke the West: Sadly, the ethnic card has been implemented since the 1960s, when the misguided neo-Marxist student revolution took place in the United States and Europe. With its remarkable rebellion against traditional values, religion and old philosophies, the Liberals insist that individuals who are black should not be treated the same way one would with a white person.
This form for racism (racism defined as the evaluation of a person only based on the person’s ethnic origin or skin color) is now at the core of Leftwing, Liberal thinking and permeates the very structures of the mainstream media.
Steadily focusing on skin color rather than the Western ideal of equality regardless of race, ethnic origin, gender, creed or class, we now face a situation where skin color has been brought to the forefront of the debate.
RELATED ARTICLES:
- Critical Race Theory and Marxism in America
- How Racism against Whites was legitimized by Marxist Multiculturalism
- Oldham rape scandal: UK Labour party refuses to back inquiry, protects Muslim grooming gang rapists
- RAPE OF BRITAIN: The Despicable British Government Gave Immigrant-invaders the Right to Rape Underage Girls
- Jacques Derrida and the Racist Left Victimization of Blacks: Socialist Racism
- Marcuse and The New Left’ desire to silence the Majority
How Marxism successfully broke the West: It represents a total breaking away from the historic, Western principle and ideal of equality regardless of race, ethnic origin, gender, creed or class.
Today, you are evaluated on the basis of your skin, not character. The very same happened to Jews, Gypsies and other unwanted ethnic groups during World War II and was at the core of Nazi ideology.
Which philosophers brought these race theories into the West? Who began teaching students at the universities that they must break down their own culture?
One example of a neo-Marxist philosopher who implemented this type of racism is Jacques Derrida (1930-2004). He is considered the father of neo-Marxist “deconstruction” of traditional Western values and correspondingly, the demonization of these.
He famously speaks about power structures as pairs, one weak and the other strong, male-female, “white” versus “black”, majority versus minority and so on, are all considered opposites, automatically assuming that the power balance is static.
This means that the “male” is always the strong in the pair, and the “female” always the weak. The “European” is always the strong, and “the immigrant” always the weak, helpless victim.
One should “always feel sorry for” Africans, but not for Europeans, as they are automatically considered “the strong” in the power pair.
The “white man” is “always” at the top, while the “black man” is at the bottom. Therefore, the black man needs to be helped, since it is assumed that he cannot help himself.
This was the philosophy that dominated what I call the racist thinking of Derrida. He perfected post-modernism, yet again a Marxist derived class struggle philosophy strongly opposing traditional Western values. I describe this in New Left Tyranny. The Authoritarian Destruction of Our Way of Life.
He sought to find other solutions than the classic, Christian principles that were ideals for hundreds of years, joining the forces with atheist thinkers in attacking traditional Western values.
Derrida’s theories ended up, as we see, actually placing the focus on skin color and ethnic origin as determent of how to treat people.
He reintroduced skin color as a Marxist “class issue” or problem, only about twenty years after Hitler lost the war.
How Marxism successfully broke the West: Yet, the color of someone’s skin does not determine who is right or wrong. Why were the Western 1960s’ youth and philosophers such as Derrida so eager to embrace the racism innate in such a theory?
Why did the Marxists include – without criticism – the race theory that later was to re-ignite the Nazi notion that good and bad corresponds to somebody’s skin color?
Instead of pushing for the classical, Western concept of equality, regardless of race, ethnic origin, gender, creed or class, the neo-Marxist movement has ended up producing race theories that give superiority according to the color of skin.
