How rogue judges have gone to war with Trump, the Constitution and America. is featured in this month’s Whistleblower at WND.
“Show me the man, I’ll find you the crime!” So said Lavrenty Beria, the notorious chief of the secret police under the Soviet Union’s long-time and epically ruthless leader, Josef Stalin.
Attempted judicial coup d’etat: What that meant, of course, was that any person regarded as a genuine threat to the communist dictatorship would be tried in a kangaroo court on serious but totally made-up crimes. As the Encyclopedia Britannica puts it: “In high-profile, carefully scripted purge trials, perceived political opponents of the government were convicted of heinous offenses that they had not committed.”
In today’s America, the parallels are both eerie and inescapable, writes David Kupelian, award-winning journalist, Editor-in-Chief of the WND News Center and the bestselling author of “The Marketing of Evil,” “How Evil Works” and “The Snapping of the American Mind.”
Remember, after all, that the Democratic Party has embraced not only socialism and the bizarre neo-Marxist religion of “wokeism,” but straight-up pathological delusion – everything from championing “transgender” men destroying women’s athletics and invading their locker rooms, to intentionally engineering a full-scale invasion of America by foreign gangbangers, sex traffickers and criminals, including thousands of convicted murderers and rapists.
Attempted judicial coup d’etat: So corrupt and delusional has today’s Democratic Party become that, for the first time in history, a major political party pushed a man with obvious dementia (who also happened to be head of a de facto crime family) into the White House as a puppet president, all the while secretly controlling him – and therefore the country – via a hidden “politburo” of puppet-string pullers.
It is this deranged and shockingly corrupt political party that in recent times has been using the judiciary to advance an unholy and catastrophic agenda – first, by following Beria’s example of “finding the crime” to fit “the man,” in this case President Donald J. Trump.
However, despite the absurdly political wall-to-wall prosecutions of Trump throughout the Biden presidency – after all, in just a short period of time he was suddenly indicted for nearly 100 different crimes! – the “purge trials” ultimately came to naught, with the judges and prosecutors, one by one, being exposed as ridiculously partisan, and sometimes flat-out corrupt, pawns in the Deep State’s war against Donald Trump, whom they delight in mocking as “a convicted felon!”
RELATED ARTICLES:
- Hillary Clinton Endorses White Replacement blasting Trump for emphasis on the family, Christianity, children
- The Socialist hatred of Free Speech: Read shocking quotes from Karl Marx, Lenin, Marcuse and other founding fathers
- European leaders are submerged in the Marxist Authoritarian Socialist Strategy to Silence Opposition
- The well-organized LA riots: How to plan a Color Revolution with Saul Alinsky and Gene Sharp
Attempted judicial coup d’etat: But then, after Trump’s stunning electoral-landslide reelection victory in November 2024 and the breathtakingly rapid rollout of his promised and much-needed reforms starting on Inauguration Day, the judicial attacks on Trump assumed a new and different form: Now left-leaning judges across the land would ignore their oaths of office, the clear intent of the law and the constitutional separation of powers, and instead fixate on undermining and blocking at every turn the pro-America agenda of the democratically elected president of the United States.
Indeed, many top legal analysts say what is happening in America right now constitutes nothing short of an attempted judicial coup d’etat.
But why, one might ask, would judges be the new warriors dedicated to stopping Trump?
Consider that when Trump won the 2024 election, the Republican Party also captured both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Finally, most voters assumed, Team Trump had the power, authority and congressional backing to implement much-needed changes and “make America great again.” After all, that’s how the nation’s system has always worked.
But wait. What if the judiciary, the remaining constitutional branch of America’s unique tripartite government, took on a new role – of undermining and overruling the president?
As it turned out, the same judiciary that disgraced itself with all the idiotically corrupt, wall-to-wall lawfare attacks against Donald Trump throughout the Biden administration has been only too willing to do its part to stop Trump at any cost now, be it legal or illegal, moral or immoral, sane or completely insane.
To describe the game plan simply: If you don’t like something President Trump is doing, just file a lawsuit with any one of thousands of judges, making sure to pick one who dislikes Trump and his policies. And then suddenly, one local judge – deliberating in his or her little jurisdiction in one of 50 sovereign states – writes something on a piece of paper and magically overrules the overwhelmingly elected and constitutionally empowered president of the United States.
Attempted judicial coup d’etat: Hundreds of such lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration in the last few months, attempting to reverse multiple common-sense policies overwhelmingly supported by Americans – most notably, Trump’s efforts to deport illegal-alien criminals, gang members and terrorists.
The drama has sometimes reached almost comical heights, with one jurist – James Boasberg, the chief judge of the United States District Court in Washington, D.C. – actually ordering planes carrying Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador to turn around mid-flight and bring back those criminals to the U.S.! Fortunately, the Trump administration did not comply, and Judge Boasberg is now facing a motion for impeachment from the House of Representatives. But then there’s Judge Hannah Dugan in Wisconsin, as well as Judge Joel Cano in New Mexico, both arrested by the FBI in late April for allegedly harboring illegal-alien gang members!
There is an unmistakably surreal element to the current judicial insurrection: Who are these people? The executive and legislative branches of government are very public, their representatives profiled and interviewed daily online, on television and in print. In stark contrast, the judicial branch of government – both its members and its workings – remain largely invisible.
The level of censorship in social media and search engines is all-time high. Do like thousands of others, subscribe to The Herland Report newsletter here!
Led by Scandinavian bestselling author, Hanne Nabintu Herland, The Herland Report provides independent analysis from leading Western intellectuals and ground breaking YouTube interviews, cutting through the mainstream media rhetoric. It is a great place to watch interviews and read the articles of leading intellectuals, thought leaders, authors and activists from across the political spectrum. The Herland Report believes in freedom of speech and its editorial policy resides above the traditional Left vs Right paradigm which we believe has lost its relevance and ability to describe the current driving forces in Western politics.
