In recent decades, America became complacent, misinterpreting comfort as strength. The country prioritized efficiency over resilience and consumption over production, ignoring the consequences of shuttering domestic factories and relying on overseas goods as a measure of prosperity.
Assumptions about reliable supply chains and responsible behavior from adversaries left the nation vulnerable. The key foundational principle lost was that economic security equals national security, and allowing the U.S. to lose its ability to produce critical goods undermines sovereignty and national strength.
Economic Security is National Security: The erosion of U.S. sovereignty occurred gradually through a series of politically expedient yet flawed decisions—including treating trade policy as separate from national security strategy. Trade policy, industrial policy, and national security policy must all fit together, or they will each fail separately.
These are remarks by Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in his brilliant speech at the 2026 Reagan National Economic Forum.
“The truth is that for too long, America had been asleep… We told ourselves that so long as goods were cheaper overseas, it did not matter whether factories went dark in Michigan, Ohio, or Pennsylvania. We assumed that supply chains would always function smoothly, adversaries would always behave responsibly, and the invisible hand would correct vulnerabilities that too few in public life had the courage to confront. And while we reassured ourselves with those assumptions, risks accumulated all around us,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated.
Economic Security is National Security: “Somewhere along the way, we lost sight of a foundational principle that previous generations understood instinctively: economic security is national security, for a nation that cannot manufacture, mine, ship, or refine its needs gradually cedes its strength—and sovereignty—to others. That is a dangerous dependency for any country. It is an unacceptable one for the United States.
Now, nations rarely cede their security in a single moment. More often, they drift into dependence through a series of politically expedient decisions. For our part, we made a series of mistakes—some bipartisan, others ideological, and many defended long after their costs became impossible to ignore.
One was treating trade policy as though it existed apart from national strategy. We convinced ourselves that we could pursue commercial partnerships in one silo while managing security relationships in another—as if the world would honor those distinctions. But a nation that relies on a rival for critical inputs, finances the rise of countries that do not share its interests, and allows its own productive base to erode while promising to defend the international order will find, sooner or later, that those two silos collapse into each other.,” he says.
RELATED ARTICLES:
- The American System of sovereign states vs. Globalism
- End of globalism: Jamie Dimon, Tony Blair, Mark Carney confesses that outsourcing supply chains was a massive mistake
- Dr. Ben Carson: American democracy, innovation, boldness, hard work, freedom of expression, faith in God made it the greatest nation in modern times
- How Racism and Division Powers the Left: Neo-Marxist Jacques Derrida and Deconstruction Theory
- Brilliant Analysis on How US Economy Was Destroyed and the One Percent Tyranny Implemented
- Marco Rubio Munich speech 2026: Calls for ending globalism, defending national sovereignty, Christian heritage, military strength, reindustrialization
Economic Security is National Security: The granting of permanent normal trade relations to China and its accession to the WTO were sold as steps to level markets but instead led to American industries competing unfairly against state-led subsidies and market distortions, he says. The rules-based system failed to enforce reciprocity adequately, prioritizing efficiency over the crucial concept of supply chain resilience.
The COVID-19 pandemic did not create fragile supply chains but exposed existing weaknesses—such as U.S. dependence on foreign suppliers for semiconductors, critical minerals, large-capacity batteries, and pharmaceutical ingredients.
Recovery efforts did not prioritize reform, and America continues to import the majority of rare earth minerals vital for 21st-century technologies, with only a small percentage of active pharmaceutical ingredients domestically produced.
The once-formidable American shipbuilding industry has declined sharply. Warnings from workers, military planners, manufacturers, and public health officials about these vulnerabilities were ignored in favor of comfort and old economic formulas. The underlying failure was the reduction of economics to consumption, neglecting the importance of domestic production.
“In reducing economics to consumption, we forgot production. We measured abundance at the checkout counter rather than the factory gate. We talked about GDP, but not enough about its composition. And we prized low-cost inputs without first asking whether a nation can remain sovereign when it loses command over the things that matter most. A country cannot outsource its industrial commons, ignore strategic concentration, and expect to remain secure, for manufacturing is more than output on a balance sheet. It is a reservoir of practical capability: engineers and welders, tool-and-die makers and logistics networks, plant managers and workers who know how to solve problems on the factory floor. When that ecosystem is strong, a country can adapt quickly. When it is hollowed out, adaptation becomes slower, more costly, and less certain.”
Economic Security is National Security: “So, on his first day back in office, President Trump issued the America First Trade Policy memorandum—a sweeping directive to Treasury, Commerce, Homeland Security, USTR, and other agencies to stop treating trade as a technocratic afterthought instead of an instrument of national strategy. Last April, the President declared a national emergency tied to the cumulative effects of foreign trade practices and announced reciprocal tariff actions framed explicitly around national and economic security. A few weeks later, President Trump signed executive action on processed critical minerals and derivative products under Section 232, expressly linking import dependence to risks for national security, defense readiness, price stability, and economic resilience. Some have tried to weaponize critical minerals against us, but this Administration is ensuring that they will not succeed.”
“On maritime strength, President Trump signed an executive order to restore America’s maritime dominance, established a new Office of Maritime and Industrial Capacity at the National Security Council, and called for a Maritime Action Plan to rebuild U.S. shipbuilding capabilities. This is what it looks like to connect industrial capacity, logistics resilience, workforce development, and national security in one strategic frame.”
Despite past vulnerabilities, America still possesses significant advantages such as: The world’s deepest capital markets, innovative capacity, abundant energy resources, leading universities, an entrepreneurial culture and workforce capable of outbuilding global competitors when conditions are fair.
Decline is a choice, and renewal is achievable through deliberate government action and strategic vision.
The level of censorship in social media and search engines is all-time high. Do like thousands of others, subscribe to The Herland Report newsletter here!
Led by Scandinavian bestselling author, Hanne Nabintu Herland, The Herland Report provides independent analysis from leading Western intellectuals and ground breaking Podcasts and YouTube interviews, cutting through the mainstream media rhetoric. It is a great place to watch interviews and read the articles of leading intellectuals, thought leaders, authors and activists from across the political spectrum. The Herland Report believes in freedom of speech and its editorial policy resides above the traditional Left vs Right paradigm which we believe has lost its relevance and ability to describe the current driving forces in Western politics.
