When examining the effects of the Marxist feminism that engulfed the West from the 1960s onward, it becomes clear that the ideology has produced weak women that chronically believe that they are victims of some imagined patriarchy.
The feminism of the 1960s has successfully told the woman that only when disentangled from the family can she truly be free. Freedom is hers to the degree she is able to distance herself from her womanhood.
The family must be broken down as female emancipation depends on her being alone, apart from the fellowship of men. Fidelity in marriage and marriage as an institution is thereby viewed as a problem and an obstacle to her freedom, hindering the woman from serving men in free sex and a promiscuous life.
The degree of misogynist poison engraved in this society destroying, neo-Marxist ideology is simply appalling. For example, author of The Battered Woman, Lenore Walker openly stated that psychotherapists should encourage breaking the family apart.
The author of Declaration on Feminism, Helen Sullinger said that that marriage is the very institution that we must work to destroy, writes Hanne Nabintu Herland, historian of comparative religions, author and the founder of The Herland Report at WND, America’s largest conservative news network.
Demonic Misogynistic Feminism: Journalist Ellen Willis wrote that the objective of every feminist reform, from legal abortion to child-care programs, is to undermine traditional family values.
This venomous influence on the minds of Western women has even succeeded in pretty much defining the man as the enemy who is to be hated. And women have remarkably enough believed the illusion that a loveless and often childless life is the path to freedom.
As pointed out in another WND article, all should support female emancipation, political and social equal rights. No woman, man or child should have to endure evil, injustice and abuse at the hands of others.
RELATED ARTICLES:
- How Marxist Feminism Destroyed the Family and Hillary Clinton applauds it
- Marxist Feminist Hillary Clinton trashes women, labels Republican women as handmaidens to the patriarchy
- Vast difference between Conservative Feminism and Marxist Man Hating Feminism
- Welfare and Feminism Destroyed the American Family
- Jordan Peterson and how Marxist Feminism creates Conflict and Chaos
Demonic Misogynistic Feminism: Therefore, classical Western ideals precisely defined the need for equality regardless of gender, race, religion or social standing as a vital principle of justice. We have had very constructive feminist’ movements in history, one of them took place at the beginning of the 1900s, read this article.
The feminism criticized is the radical-revolutionary movement of the 1960s which had completely different goals. So how did we get to where we are today?
Which neo-Marxist thinkers paved the way for this sinister and fellowship hating ideology? How did they succeed to penetrate society – first and foremost the female brain – with its poisonous, Marxist message that now is tearing Western cultural stability apart?
One may wonder how women were outsmarted into believing in the demonic notion that the fellowship of mankind is their enemy.
Some explanation is found in the ideological work of one of the fathers of New Left feminism, neo-Marxist Jacques Derrida (1930-2004). He invented the concept of “deconstruction” of Western values and correspondingly the demonization of these. He famously speaks about power structures as pairs, one weak and the other strong. Male-female, white-black, majority-minority, and so on, automatically assuming that the power balance always is static.
By giving the female the weak role, Derrida ended up imposing a self-denigrating view of the female upon the New Left feminism. She was chronically deferred to the role of the victim, forming her identity as the weak element in the power structure.
Demonic Misogynistic Feminism: This means that the “male” is always the strong in the pair, and the “female” always the weak. The “white man” is always strong and “the colored man” is always a weak, helpless victim and so on. Derrida was so simple minded that he did not even reflect upon the fact that power fluctuates; it is not static to one group.
We already know this from history, as powerful feudal nobility were replaced by the renaissance bourgeoisie. One group was powerful in a particular historical setting, the new group dominating in yet another time period.
Derrida perfected post-modernism, a Marxist derived class struggle philosophy which strongly opposed traditional Western values.
His anti-Western, anti-equality and misogynist thinking contributed strongly to the development of the Critical Race Theory, a racist Marxist theory which runs rampant at Western universities today dividing individuals according to gender and race rather than by the classical principle of equality.
With a shocking dose of male chauvinism, Derrida infused into the Western female brain that she is always discriminated against by men, that her femininity is her weakness, her child bearing ability worthless; that unless she takes the man’s role in society, she remains futile.
Why women in the 1960s did not see through his misogyny, and lack of respect for the power of her womanhood remains a mystery.
Maybe they fell for it due to the rampant state of rebellion against traditional values that the New Left was promoting, desperately looking for some anti-traditional ideology that would make classical values redundant.
Women sure did not comprehend the extent of Derrida’s anti-humanist analysis – and swallowed the bait. The question remains, was Derrida simply an unintelligent Marxist, or was his job precisely to push for the end of Western stability?
