Racism Against Indigenous Europeans by their own Governments: The UK Horror Story

 

President Donald Trump has been remarkably vocal about the need to make America great again. Central to his conservative narrative is taking care of the citizens of the United States first and foremost, reinstating the traditional values that once made the U.S. such a prosperous state, where individuals from all walks of life could get ahead by working hard and supporting each other.

Yet, in socialist Europe, few political leaders seem bent on protecting the native citizens of its own nation-states.

Racism Against Indigenous Europeans: Few cases have more brilliantly illustrated the profound effect of Marxist discrimination against indigenous white Europeans than UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s blatant refusal for years to crack down hard on foreign-born Muslim rapists, murderers, and grooming gangs.

This writes bestselling author, historian Hanne Nabintu Herland in this excerpt from her latest book, Trump. The battle for America 2025 Edition.

The European story is as shocking as it is sad. An inquiry into UK towns like Rotherham uncovered that predominantly 1,400 white British girls were sexually abused and tortured for almost 20 years by British Muslim men, mostly of Pakistani origin.

So, why have UK leaders such as PM Starmer been so soft on the Muslim grooming rape gangs that have ravaged white, British girls for years?

Note: Also watch Hanne Nabintu Herland’s recent interview with WND co-founder, Elizabeth Farah.

 

 

Racism Against Indigenous Europeans: Elon Musk blew the whistle on X and joined the UK public rage against Keir Starmer for refusing a national inquiry into the historic grooming gang scandal. Musk’s comments brought the horrifying details to light, writing on X that Keir Starmer is evil and should be sentenced to prison.

By posting “no justice for severe, violent crimes, but prison for social media posts,” Musk referred to the recent Southport stabbings, in which British girls were killed by yet another foreign-born national.

Instead of supporting the popular reaction, Starmer instantly began a Soviet-style persecution of those who wrote harshly and critically about it in social media. As of now, around 30 people are arrested every day for writing critical remarks against the massive mass immigration that is currently happening in the UK. Many white Brits have since gone to prison for posts criticizing the government’s soft handling of illegal immigrants, rape criminals, and murderers.

 

RELATED ARTICLES:

• Former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss on the downfall of Europe
• Liz Truss: Non-elected people have taken over British institutions, push mass migration,  multiculturalism
• UK Authoritarianism: This age will be viewed as the darkest stain on British history, says Christian activist, Tommy Robinson
• The Downfall of Europe: Former UK PM Liz Truss wants national sovereignty, traditional values
• How Racism against Whites was legitimized by Marxist Multiculturalism
• Highly unpopular UK and EU leaders do not represent the British and European Indigenous Ethnicities

 

Racism Against Indigenous Europeans: So, why have UK leaders such as PM Starmer been so soft on the Muslim grooming rape gangs that have ravaged white, British girls for years?

The answer is that the neo-Marxist narrative dominating European politics since the 1960s has automatically given dark-skinned foreign-born the victim card, while white indigenous Europeans have been handed the role of chronic abusers, racists, Islamophobes, far-right lunatics, Nazis, fascists, and bigots. Arguably, whites are held harshly accountable in a way one would never dream of treating a dark-skinned foreigner. I have for long pointed this out in the European media. An an article from 2007 in Norway’s largest newspaper, I argued that “the predominant form of racism in today’s Norway is “the racism against whites.”

It was after World War II that a group of prominent neo-Marxist philosophers in Germany began to destroy Western trust in traditional, historical values such as the family, the church, God, free speech, individual freedom, and so on.

The influential French philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930–2004) was a part of this demonic Marxist push and became the hero of Western Marxists, heavily influencing the reading lists in social sciences. He is called the father of multiculturalism, wherein the “deconstruction” and demonization of traditional Western values was arguably the central aim. Its creed arguably was to evaluate individuals based on race and ethnicity rather than the Western success model based on equality regardless of race, creed, and gender.

By doing so, discrimination against white indigenous ethnicities was implemented, while dark-skinned foreigners were largely excused as people one should “feel sorry for” and not hold accountable. This narrative, widely unjust and racist as it has been, implies that certain ethnic groups are not to be held accountable in the same way one would do with a white person. From this ideal, different sets of handling people based on ethnic origin became institutionalized through the multicultural ideology.

Derrida famously spoke of power structures as pairs—one strong and the other weak, exemplified by opposites such as “male” versus “female,” “white” versus “black,” “European” versus “foreign-born immigrant,” and so on. He assumed that the power balance between these pairs is automatically static. This means the “European” is always the strong one in the pair, and the “foreign-born immigrant” always the weak one.

Consequently, one should “always feel sorry for” Africans or black Americans, but not for white Americans or white Europeans. The dark-skinned man needs to be forever “helped by the state,” since he is not capable of helping himself. I describe this in my book, New Left Tyranny.

Derrida represents the horrifyingly wrong assumption that the color of one’s skin determines who is strong or who is weak. Yet, it was traditional values that created the greatness of America, and national unity that unified the people into one great nation regardless of race, creed, gender, or ethnic origin. What Marxism has done is tear this greatness down. The historical ideal of equality regardless of race has now been deconstructed into separating us by race.