Dr. Neil Ferguson, the man behind the Imperial College Report, which showed that millions would die from Covid-19, was central in shifting the UK and US from the herd immunity strategy to society lockdown.
The report later turned out to be fraudulent, was never published scientifically, not even peer-reviewed and appeared more as a draft. And Ferguson was sacked from his job due to improper conduct meetings with married lover during lockdown, so he is already out.
The main point being that it was the WHO that painted the massive scare scenario in March, 2020 together with Dr. Neil Ferguson’s Imperial Report.
Jointly they created the mass fear scenario in which up to 65 millions could be killed by Covid-19.
The Imperial report predicted that 510,000 could die in the UK without lockdown, while 250 000 could die even with a isolationist strategy. The report is said to have made UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson change his mind from herd immunity to rapidly implementing society lockdown in the UK – still in effect today, 15 months later.
“The Imperial Report was never even published scientifically; it’s not peer-reviewed, which a scientific paper should be; it’s just an internal departmental report from Imperial. And it’s fascinating; I don’t think any other scientific endeavor has made such an impression on the world as that rather debatable paper,” said Johan Giesecke, the Swedish professor who was the State Epidemiologist for Sweden between 1995 to 2005 and former Chief Scientist of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).
Dr. Mathew Maavak, a Malaysian expert on risk foresight and governance, recently commented: “Up to 65 million people were projected to die from this contagion. Unsurprisingly, a common denominator between both projections was the omnipresent Microsoft, which helped ‘tidy up’ Dr. Neil Ferguson code. Experts and politicians the world over naturally “listened to the science,” mirroring a teenager’s hysterics over another supposedly existential issue.
Now, however, shadow-banned links are emerging from Google’s search limbo to inform us that Dr. Neil Ferguson’s code was in fact a “buggy mess” that looked “more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming,” according to one data expert. This is what our endless lockdowns and coercive vaccination programs were based on.” End quote.
Dr. Neil Ferguson has been notorious in the past for overestimating numbers. He was involved in doing so during Ebola and the Swine epidemic. He also said that 150 000 people would die during Foot and Mouth outbreak. In the end, 200 people died.
The West is now characterized by strict, elitist media censorship, hedonism, a culture of drug abuse, abortion, ethnic clashes and racial divide, a destructive feminism and the dramatic break-down of the family. The book outlines the remedy for the current malaise.
In the March 10 meeting with EU leaders, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization estimated 3.5 % or more death rates among those who contracted the virus. Tedros said that there were 118,000 cases in 114 countries, and 4,291 killed from the virus, describing the outbreak as “pandemic.”
If the death rate is 3.5 %, it would mean millions dead from Covid-19. If the death rate is 0.3 %, on the other hand, such as predicted by Rystad Energies, the extreme measures imply a dramatic over reaction.
Tedros is famous for calling Bill Gates his “brother,” the famous Western oligarch billionaire turned “world pandemic expert” with particular interest in world vaccines and controlling public health. His malfunctioning polio vaccine caused 500 000 children to be paralyzed in India, according to Robert Kennedy.
RELATED ARTICLES:
- Imperial Report – WHO Horror Scenarios questioned among allegations of politization
- Covid-19: WHO Tedros Has a Long History of Cover-Ups
- Dr. Bhakdi: Extreme measures violate human rights, prevents herd immunity #Covid-19
- Seasonal flu kills many more than Covid-19, yet nobody talks about it
Dr. Mathew Maavak, a Malaysian expert on risk foresight and governance recently reminded us all about Dr. Neil Ferguson, the British epidemiologist who estimated that up to 65 million were to die from Covid-19. This was back in spring, 2020 and contributed to the United Kingdom scrapping herd immunity, implementing the hardcore lockdown that has lasted up to now.
Ferguson was later sacked from his position, but was very influential in swaying Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s take on Covid-19 from the herd immunity strategy to combat the Covid-19 virus.
Maavak writes that: “When enforced narratives fail, abrupt U-turns are inevitable. The global Ministry of Truth is now openly promoting the Wuhan lab leak theory when not savaging the darlings of yesteryear’s ‘coronapocalypse’.
One such fall guy is the British mathematical epidemiologist Dr. Neil Ferguson, whose Covid-19 contagion model paralleled the 3.5-hour pandemic simulation exercise called Event 201 in October 2019.
Up to 65 million people were projected to die from this contagion. Unsurprisingly, a common denominator between both projections was the omnipresent Microsoft, which helped ‘tidy up’ Ferguson’s code. Experts and politicians the world over naturally “listened to the science,” mirroring a teenager’s hysterics over another supposedly existential issue.
Now, however, shadow-banned links are emerging from Google’s search limbo to inform us that Ferguson’s code was in fact a “buggy mess” that looked “more like a bowl of angel hair pasta than a finely tuned piece of programming,” according to one data expert. This is what our endless lockdowns and coercive vaccination programs were based on.” End quote. Read the full article here.
